Home » Biotechnology »Health »News » Currently Reading:

107 Nobel Laureate Attack on Greenpeace Traced Back to Biotech PR Operators

July 1, 2016 Biotechnology, Health, News 9 Comments

by Jonathan Latham, PhD

Greenpeace was denied entrance yesterday (June 30) to a National Press Club Event in Washington, DC of 107 Nobel Laureates. The event was ostensibly organised by a scientific group calling itself Support Precision Agriculture to publicise a letter signed by 107 Nobel Laureates demanding that Greenpeace cease its opposition to “golden rice” and GMO technology in general. Greenpeace was attempting to attend the event. However, senior research specialist on GMOs, Charlie Cray, accompanied by Tim Schwab, senior researcher from Food and Water Watch were both physically prevented from entering the Press Club.

We were told that only credentialed Press were allowed.” Schwab told Independent Science News.

According to Schwab “I then saw Greg Jaffe from the NGO Center for Science in The Public Interest (CSPI) entering the room.” Informed of this, the security person changed his story: some NGO’s were invited to attend.

National Press Club, Washington, DC

National Press Club, Washington, DC

Afterwords, Schwab told us “Some NGOs were invited: Really?  Why not Greenpeace—the subject of this campaign?

Nor was the security person just anyone. Schwab and Cray recognised him as Jay Byrne. Byrne is the former head of corporate communications for Monsanto (1997-2001).

Byrne now heads the biotech public relations outfit v-Fluence and is heavily involved in biotech-academic PR. Typical of his style was a contribution to the book “Let Them Eat Precaution” published in 2005 by the American Enterprise Institute and edited by Jon Entine of the Genetic Literacy Project.

The Genetic Literacy Project promotes biotechnology. Its strapline is “Science Trumps Ideology”. Asked by Cray and Schwab why he was minding the door, Byrne claimed he was “strictly a volunteer“.

Charlie Cray, the Greenpeace researcher later tweeted this:

Charlie Cray Tweet re Jay Byrne

Charlie Cray Tweet re Jay Byrne

According to the website GMWatch, the url: supportprecisionagriculture.org has an inoperative sister: supportprecisionagriculture.com that is traceable back to the Genetic Literacy Project.

Addendum (12:56 pm): The list of signatories includes Alfred G Gilman, who died last year (on Dec 23 2015).

 

Currently there are "9 comments" on this Article:

  1. aruna rodrigues says:

    Is it possible that Nobel Laureates especially if they do not necessarily have a background in genetics can be led by the nose and fall for the oldest trick in the book —– a loss of ethics as a result of such a serious conflict of interest?

    If this is indeed so, as it appears to be we will destroy ourselves.

    • Hi Aruna, this is unrelated – sorry! I just wanted to express gratitude for all the hard work you are doing in India. What happens in India with GMOs has an impact on the rest of the world, I think. Also, I think that your article/report about the precautionary principle and GMOs was one of the best and most important pieces that was published during 2015. “The Precautionary Principle Requires to be Interpreted Critically and Pre-emptively for its Proper Application to the Unique Risks of GM Crops,” By Aruna Rodrigues, Third World Network; March – April, 2015 (59 pages) [ http://bit.ly/1MZQqVB ]
      “This technology is a classic case of ‘unforeseeable systemic ruin,’ which means that we will know we are ruined after it happens. As they say, the dead cannot make a comeback.” (Supreme Court of India Contempt Petition: Aruna Rodrigues vs GE Approval Committee et al, petition for contempt proceedings for disobeying 2007-8 court orders (re: GMO field trials); December 2015).

  2. Madeleine Love says:

    A thought popped up to research the research background of the 107 signatories. It would be good to know who these people are. Could perhaps look to see for what efforts their nobel prizes were granted.

    • Hi Madeleine,
      from GMWatch article here http://gmwatch.org/news/latest-news/17077 :

      “The laureates’ letter relies for its impact entirely on the supposed authority of the signatories. Unfortunately, however, none appear to have relevant expertise, as some commentators were quick to point out. Philip Stark, associate dean, division of mathematical and physical sciences and professor of statistics at the University of California, Berkeley, revealed on Twitter his own analysis of the expertise of the signatories: ‘1 peace prize, 8 economists, 24 physicists, 33 chemists, 41 doctors’. He added that science is ‘about evidence not authority. What do they know of agriculture? Done relevant research? Science is supposed to be “show me”, not “trust me”… Nobel prize or not.'”

  3. Michael "DOC" E. Davis says:

    Don’t forget the complicity of governmental agencies such as the EPA, Agriculture (USDA), etc. as well as the duplicitous ruling of the US Supreme Court and Obama’s Monsanto Protection Act.

  4. Need to teach the european precautionary principle as it applies to EVERYTHING the damn nazis are proposing. See also http://www.bioneers.org and http://www.hemptrade.ca. Lyle Courtsal http://www.3mpub.com, dopewardrugpeace.wordpress.com, http://www.orthomed.org

  5. Gilbert Picinich says:

    Does one need to be a genius to recognize the potential danger in eating foods that have been genetically altered? Is it not enough to know that studies influenced by biotech are limited to 4 months because mice develop tumors at a significantly greater rate after 4 months of GMO consumption? At this point do we really give any credence to the Noble Laureates when Obama got one even though he surged into Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria and killing off Kadhafi ? That last adventure in Libya is greatly responsible for the increased terrorism attacks.
    The Noble prize has become a prop bandied about by the elite to manipulate the masses. We need to think for ourselves and consume what is healthy and not what the authorities want to shove down our throats!

  6. I was appalled when I heard that UW Madison assisted in deciding that GMOs are safe. I need to know about the funding for this, especially since ROP Governor has slashed so much in our Universities, that outside monies are now speaking. As well as the Koch Bros now attempting to own Universities and their researchers. Now the Laureates… Definitely the research and the funding needs investigating. Thank you for all you do in the name of truth.

  7. Bruce says:

    Trying To 0utbama on his IgNobel Prize $ell0ut !

Comment on this Article:







Science News on the Web

Why Independent Science News?

Scientific inventions and ideas shape the future. As science becomes ever more beset by commercial and ideological pressures, there is urgent need for scientific reporting and analysis from an independent, expert, public interest perspective. With this standard, Independent Science News works to shape a future that is biodiverse, just, and healthy for everyone.
More about us...

Sign up to our mailing list

E-mail address:
Name (optional):

Translations

EnglishFrenchGermanItalianPortugueseRussianSpanish

Related News Articles

Financial Conflicts at National Academy Advisory Panel on the Future of GMO Regulation

Many European Pesticide Approvals Are “unlawful” Says EU Ombudsman

GE Soybeans Give Altered Milk and Stunted Offspring, Researchers Find

What Happened to Obama’s Promise to Restore Scientific Integrity?

New Research Links Neonicotinoid Pesticides to Monarch Butterfly Declines

EU Safety Institutions Caught Plotting an Industry “escape route” Around Looming Pesticide Ban

How “Extreme Levels” of Roundup in Food Became the Industry Norm

Can the Scientific Reputation of Pamela Ronald, Public Face of GMOs, Be Salvaged?

Commentaries

Cornell Faculty Refuse to Defend GMO Crops

empty-chair

by Jonathan Latham, PhD Who would have thought that at Cornell University, arguably the most highly regarded agricultural university in the world, no scientist would speak for the benefits and safety of GMOs? Perhaps I should have known, however. Last year I was invited to debate the merits of GMOs …

Why the Food Movement is Unstoppable

jose bove, farmer and activist

by Jonathan Latham, PhD In 1381, for the first and only time, the dreaded Tower of London was captured from the King of England. The forces that seized it did not belong to a foreign power; nor were they rebellious workers – they were peasants who went on to behead …

How the GE Food Venture Has Been Chronically Dependent on Deception

Food and Drug Administration, Maryland

by Steven M. Druker, J.D. Although it purports to be based on solid science and the open flow of information on which science depends, the massive venture to reconfigure the genetic core of the world’s food supply has substantially relied on the propagation of falsehoods. Its advancement and very survival …

Millions Spent, No One Served: Who Is to Blame for the Failure of GMO Golden Rice?

Rice Farming

by Angelika Hilbeck and Hans Herren The recent Nobel laureates’ letter accusing Greenpeace of a “crime against humanity” for opposing genetically modified (GMO) golden rice reveals a deep division not only between civil societies and some science circles but also within the science community – a division in the visions …

More Commentaries...

Reviews

Poison Spring: The Secret History of Pollution and the EPA

Poison Spring Evaggelos Valllianatos

Book Author: Evaggelos Vallianatos with McKay Jenkins Reviewed by: Carol Van Strum “Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts,” Richard Feynman famously declared in 1966. Ever quick to challenge accepted wisdom, he distinguished the laudable ignorance of science, forever seeking unattainable certainties, from the dangerous ignorance of experts …

The Real Cost of Fracking: How America’s Shale Gas Boom Is Threatening Our Families, Pets, and Food

The Real Cost of Fracking book cover

Book Authors: Michelle Bamberger and Robert Oswald Reviewed by Allison Wilson (The Bioscience Resource Project) The first researchers to systematically document ill health in livestock, pets, and people living near fracking drill sites were Michelle Bamberger and Robert Oswald. Bamberger, a veterinarian, and Oswald, a professor of molecular medicine at …

More Reviews...

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons